International Payment Methods: Complete 2026 Guide by Region

Cross-border payments reached $190 trillion in 2024, yet payment methods vary dramatically by region. What works in the US fails in Brazil where PIX commands 40% of e-commerce, or India where UPI accounts for over 80% of retail digital payments.

Payment companies expanding internationally often default to SWIFT or card networks without realizing regional rails are faster, cheaper, and preferred by local users. The result: poor conversion rates and unnecessary costs.

This guide breaks down international payment methods by region, covering traditional rails, instant payment systems (PIX, UPI, SEPA Instant), and stablecoin alternatives. For each region, we explain dominant local methods, settlement speeds, cost structures, and when to use each option.

What are international payment methods?

International payment methods are the mechanisms and infrastructure used to transfer funds between parties in different countries. These methods include traditional banking rails (SWIFT, wire transfers), regional instant payment systems (PIX, SEPA Instant, UPI), card networks, and digital alternatives like stablecoins.

Opening paragraph: Define international payment methods broadly, distinguish from domestic payments.

Key characteristics of international payment methods:

• Cross-border capability: Must move funds between different countries and banking systems
• Currency exchange: Often involve converting between currencies
• Multiple regulatory jurisdictions: Must comply with rules in sending and receiving countries
• Varying settlement speeds: Range from seconds (instant rails) to days (correspondent banking)
• Cost structures: Include transaction fees, FX spreads, intermediary charges

International payment methods serve various purposes: paying suppliers, compensating employees, remittances, B2B invoicing, and e-commerce transactions. The choice depends on corridor, transaction size, settlement urgency, and cost tolerance.

How international payments differ from domestic payments

International payments introduce complexity that domestic payments avoid: multiple currencies requiring conversion, multiple regulatory jurisdictions, and chains of intermediary banks.

‍

The Financial Stability Board's 2024 G20 Roadmap report found that one-third of retail cross-border payments still took more than one business day to complete, and average remittance costs remained at 6.2% globally. This creates both a pain point for businesses and an opportunity for infrastructure providers offering faster, cheaper alternatives.

Types of international payment methods

International payment methods range from legacy correspondent banking to real-time digital rails. Each type serves different use cases based on transaction size, urgency, and corridor.

‍

SWIFT's wholesale payments still dominate large-value B2B transfers, with 90.4% of wholesale payments completing within one hour according to the FSB. But for smaller transactions and emerging markets, regional instant rails and stablecoin alternatives offer dramatically better economics.

Regional payment methods at a glance

Before diving into each region, here's a summary of the dominant payment methods and their key characteristics:

Latin America payment methods

Latin America has rapidly adopted instant payment infrastructure, with Brazil's PIX becoming the most successful example globally.

PIX (Brazil)

PIX processed 68.7 billion transactions in 2024, a 52% increase year-over-year, according to the Central Bank of Brazil. The system handles over $5 trillion in annual value with settlement in under 10 seconds, 24/7/365. Adoption has reached 76.4% of Brazil's 211 million population, making it the dominant payment method for both consumers and businesses.

For fintechs building in Brazil, PIX integration is essential. The system supports both pay-ins and pay-outs, enabling instant collections from customers and real-time payroll disbursements. Transaction costs are minimal compared to card payments or traditional bank transfers.

PIX's success stems from several factors: mandatory adoption by banks above a certain size, zero cost for consumers, and a unified QR code standard. The system has effectively replaced boletos (bank slips) and reduced card payment volume in many categories. For international fintechs, PIX represents a template for how instant payment infrastructure can rapidly transform a market.

SPEI (Mexico)

SPEI (Sistema de Pagos Electrónicos Interbancarios) is Mexico's real-time gross settlement system, processing interbank transfers with settlement times ranging from minutes to hours. Transaction costs typically fall between $0.50-$2, making it economical for B2B payments and payroll.

For US-to-Mexico corridors, SPEI offers a faster alternative to SWIFT, though it requires a local banking partner. Many fintechs serving the remittance market combine SPEI with stablecoin rails to optimize the cross-border leg while using local rails for the last mile.

Europe payment methods

Europe benefits from SEPA, which creates a unified payment area across 36 countries, plus country-specific instant payment systems.

SEPA Instant

SEPA Instant Credit Transfer settles euro transactions in under 10 seconds, 24/7/365, across 36 countries including the EU, EEA, UK, and others. According to the European Central Bank, instant credit transfers reached 16% of euro area credit transfers in H2 2024, with 56.1 billion total transactions processed in the euro area during that period.

As of January 2025, SEPA Instant became mandatory for EU banks, which should accelerate adoption. For fintechs operating in Europe, SEPA Instant integration enables real-time euro settlements without the delays of traditional SEPA Credit Transfers (which typically settle T+1).

The transaction limit for SEPA Instant is €100,000, which covers most B2B and payroll use cases. Banks charge varying fees for instant transfers, but competition is driving costs down. For treasurers and finance teams, SEPA Instant reduces the cash flow forecasting complexity that comes with batch settlement windows.

UK Faster Payments

UK Faster Payments settles transactions in seconds with limits up to £1 million per payment. The system operates 24/7 and processes the vast majority of UK interbank transfers. For fintechs serving the UK market, Faster Payments provides a reliable, low-cost alternative to SWIFT for GBP-denominated transactions.

Asia Pacific payment methods

Asia Pacific leads global adoption of digital payments, with India's UPI and China's mobile payment ecosystem driving unprecedented transaction volumes.

UPI (India)

India's Unified Payments Interface has become the world's largest real-time payment system. According to the Indian government, UPI accounts for approximately 49% of global real-time payment transactions based on the ACI Worldwide 2024 report. The system processed 16.99 billion transactions in January 2025 alone, according to NPCI data reported by Business Standard.

UPI settles instantly, operates 24/7, and has expanded internationally to seven countries including Singapore, UAE, and the UK. For fintechs serving the Indian market or the Indian diaspora, UPI integration is increasingly essential for both pay-ins and pay-outs.

What makes UPI remarkable is its architecture: an interoperable system built by the National Payments Corporation of India that allows any bank or fintech app to participate. This has created intense competition on user experience while maintaining network-level standardization. The result is that over 350 million users actively use the platform with a 99.2% payment success rate. For fintechs evaluating emerging market payment infrastructure, UPI demonstrates what's possible with well-designed national payment systems.

Alipay and WeChat Pay (China)

China's mobile payment market is dominated by Alipay and WeChat Pay, which together process the vast majority of mobile transactions in the country. These platforms combine payment functionality with broader ecosystem services, creating closed-loop payment environments.

For international businesses, both platforms offer cross-border payment capabilities that enable foreign merchants to accept payments from Chinese consumers. Integration typically requires partnerships with licensed payment service providers in China.

Africa payment methods

Mobile money has transformed financial services across Africa, with M-PESA serving as the pioneering example.

M-PESA

M-PESA, operated by Safaricom and Vodafone, processed 28.33 billion transactions valued at KSh 40.24 trillion (approximately $310 billion USD) in FY 2024, according to Safaricom's annual report. The platform serves over 33 million monthly active customers in Kenya alone and operates across seven African countries.

M-PESA demonstrates how mobile money can leapfrog traditional banking infrastructure. For fintechs targeting African markets, mobile money integration is often more important than traditional bank rails, particularly for reaching unbanked and underbanked populations.

Mobile money ecosystem

Beyond M-PESA, Africa's mobile money ecosystem includes MTN Mobile Money, Orange Money, and numerous other providers. The GSMA estimates that mobile money processes over $1 trillion annually across the continent. Each market has dominant players, so fintechs typically need multiple integrations to achieve broad coverage.

North America payment methods

North America combines legacy infrastructure like ACH with emerging real-time payment options.

ACH (United States)

The ACH Network processed 33.6 billion payments valued at $86.2 trillion in 2024, according to Nacha. Standard ACH typically settles T+1 to T+2 at costs of $0.03-$0.10 per transaction, making it the backbone of US B2B payments, payroll, and bill pay.

Same Day ACH, which has grown 45.3% year-over-year, offers faster settlement (same business day) at slightly higher costs (approximately $0.17 per transaction). In 2024, Same Day ACH surpassed 1.2 billion payments for the first time, processing $3.2 trillion in value.

For B2B payments, ACH remains dominant due to its low cost and universal reach to all US bank accounts. The system handles everything from payroll direct deposits (93% of American workers receive pay via ACH) to vendor payments to tax refunds. While slower than real-time alternatives, ACH's reliability and cost structure make it the default choice for recurring payments and batch disbursements.

FedNow

FedNow, launched in July 2023 by the Federal Reserve, enables instant settlement (under 30 seconds) 24/7/365 for participating financial institutions. While adoption is still growing, FedNow positions the US to compete with instant payment systems in other markets.

For fintechs, FedNow offers a new option for use cases requiring immediate settlement, though coverage depends on receiving banks supporting the system.

Stablecoin rails as a cross-regional alternative

Stablecoin networks offer a fundamentally different approach to international payments, bypassing correspondent banking entirely.

How stablecoin payments work

Stablecoins like USDC and USDT are blockchain-based tokens pegged to fiat currencies (typically USD). Cross-border transfers settle in 10-30 minutes depending on the blockchain, with transaction costs of 0.1-0.3% regardless of amount or corridor.

For a $10,000 payment from the US to Brazil, traditional SWIFT might cost $50+ in fees plus 2-3% in FX spreads with 3-5 day settlement. The same payment via stablecoin rails could cost $10-30 with 30-minute settlement. Read more about this comparison in why stablecoin transfers are faster than bank wires.

Stablecoin infrastructure considerations

Stablecoin payments require on-ramps (fiat to stablecoin) and off-ramps (stablecoin to fiat), plus compliance infrastructure for KYC/AML requirements. Many fintechs use hybrid approaches, leveraging stablecoin rails for the cross-border leg while connecting to local instant rails (PIX, SEPA Instant, UPI) for the final mile.

The compliance landscape is evolving. In the US, the GENIUS Act represents the beginning of stablecoin regulation, providing clearer rules for issuers and payment providers. The EU's MiCA framework similarly establishes regulatory clarity for stablecoin operations in Europe.

For infrastructure comparisons, see stablecoin vs traditional FX for cross-border payments and USDT vs USDC comparison.

Build multi-regional payment infrastructure with Due

For fintechs building cross-border payment capabilities, the infrastructure choice compounds over time. The rails you integrate today determine your settlement costs, working capital requirements, and market expansion speed for years.

Due provides unified API access to local payment rails across 80+ countries, including PIX, SPEI, SEPA Instant, UPI, M-PESA, ACH, SWIFT, and stablecoin networks. The platform supports 30+ currencies with instant or next-day settlement, built-in KYC/AML compliance, and real-time FX conversion.

Whether you're a neobank expanding internationally, a crypto exchange building fiat on/off ramps, or a payroll platform serving global contractors, the right infrastructure eliminates the trade-off between geographic coverage and settlement speed.