Blockchain is a distributed ledger technology that records transactions across multiple computers. No single entity controls the ledger. Instead, all network participants maintain copies and validate new transactions together.

Think of blockchain as a digital record book that everyone can see but no one can erase. Each page (block) in this book connects to the previous page through cryptographic links. Once you write something on a page, you cannot change it without alerting the entire network.

For payment infrastructure, blockchain replaces traditional intermediaries like correspondent banks. A stablecoin transfer settles in seconds rather than the 3-5 business days typical of SWIFT wire transfers.

How blockchain works for payments

Blockchain processes payments through five steps. Here's how a $10,000 (USD) USDC payment works:

1. Creating the transaction

A user creates a payment transaction with the recipient's wallet address and the amount. This happens through a wallet interface or payment API.

2. Broadcasting to the network

The transaction broadcasts to nodes across the blockchain. Nodes are computers running blockchain software that maintain copies of the ledger.

3. Validation

Nodes check two things:

• Does the sender have sufficient balance?
• Has the sender already spent these funds?

This prevents double-spending without requiring a central authority.

4. Adding to a block

Valid transactions get grouped into blocks. On Ethereum, new blocks form approximately every 12 seconds. On Polygon, blocks form every two seconds.

5. Settlement finality

Once the network adds a block to the chain, the payment is final. The recipient can immediately access funds. This takes seconds to minutes depending on the blockchain, compared to 3-5 days for traditional cross-border wires.

This process eliminates pre-funding requirements. With SWIFT, banks must maintain nostro accounts prefunded in each currency. Blockchain settlement happens atomically. The transaction either completes entirely or not at all.

Key blockchain characteristics

Several properties make blockchain different from traditional payment infrastructure:

• Distributed architecture: No single entity controls the network. Ethereum has over 7,000 validator nodes globally. If 1,000 nodes go offline, the network keeps running.
• Immutability: Once recorded, transactions cannot be changed or deleted. This creates a permanent audit trail for compliance reporting.
• Transparency: All transactions are publicly visible. Anyone can verify that a payment occurred, the amount, and when it settled. This enables real-time payment reconciliation without banks exchanging messages.
• Programmability: Smart contracts enable automated payments. A payment can release automatically when conditions are met, like delivery confirmation or invoice approval.
• 24/7 operation: Unlike banking systems that close for weekends and holidays, blockchains operate continuously. A payment on Sunday night settles just as fast as one on Tuesday morning.

These characteristics create different infrastructure than SWIFT or card networks. Instead of passing messages between banks with separate ledgers, blockchain provides one shared ledger that all parties access.

Blockchain vs traditional payment rails

Here's how blockchain compares to traditional payment infrastructure:

Cost differences

The cost advantage depends on payment size and corridor. A $25 (USD) wire transfer fee represents 2.5% of a $1,000 (USD) payment but only 0.025% of a $100,000 (USD) payment.

Blockchain network fees don't scale with payment size. A $1,000 (USD) USDC transfer costs the same as a $1 million (USD) transfer, typically $1-5 (USD) depending on network congestion.

Working capital impact

Settlement speed affects working capital efficiency. Traditional cross-border payments require pre-funding accounts in each currency corridor.

A payment platform processing $10 million (USD) monthly with 3-day settlement needs approximately $1 million (USD) in pre-funded accounts. Blockchain settlement in minutes reduces this to approximately $50,000 (USD), freeing $950,000 (USD) in working capital.

Common blockchain use cases in payments

Payment companies use blockchain infrastructure where traditional rails create constraints:

Cross-border B2B payments

Companies paying international suppliers benefit from instant settlement and lower costs. A business paying a Brazilian supplier $50,000 (USD) monthly saves $200-300 (USD) per transaction in wire fees, or $2,400-3,600 (USD) annually, by settling with USDC rather than SWIFT.

Payroll for remote contractors

Global payroll platforms use stablecoins to pay contractors in emerging markets where banking infrastructure is limited. Instant settlement means contractors receive payment within minutes rather than waiting days.

Treasury operations

Companies holding stablecoin reserves move funds between operating entities instantly without wire fees. A company with operations in 10 countries can rebalance treasury positions daily at minimal cost.

On/off ramps for crypto platforms

Exchanges and wallets use blockchain rails to move between fiat and crypto. A user depositing $10,000 (USD) to buy Bitcoin benefits from instant settlement rather than waiting 3-5 days for ACH transfer.

Real-time FX settlement

Blockchain enables instant conversion between currency pairs. Converting EUR to MXN traditionally requires two bank transfers and 3-5 days. Using EURC and a DEX, the same conversion settles in minutes.

The infrastructure particularly benefits underserved corridors. Sending money from Europe to Nigeria via SWIFT might take 5-7 days and cost 6-8% in fees. Using USDC settles in minutes for under 1% total cost.

Blockchain networks for payment infrastructure

Different blockchain networks serve different payment needs based on speed, cost, and stability:

Ethereum

The most established smart contract platform with over $100 billion (USD) in stablecoins. Key characteristics include:

• Settlement finality: approximately 15 minutes
• Network fees: $1-50 (USD) depending on congestion
• Best for: larger payments where security matters most

Polygon

An Ethereum scaling solution with faster, cheaper transactions. Key characteristics include:

• Block time: 2 seconds
• Network fees: typically under $0.01 (USD)
• Best for: high-frequency, smaller-value payments like payroll

Base

A Layer 2 network built on Ethereum with fast finality and low fees. Growing stablecoin adoption makes it increasingly relevant for payment applications.

Tron

Optimized for stablecoin transfers with very low fees (typically $1 USD or less) and fast settlement. USDT on Tron is widely used for cross-border payments in Asia and emerging markets.

Arbitrum and Optimism

Ethereum Layer 2 networks with lower fees than mainnet Ethereum while maintaining security from Ethereum's base layer. Suitable for platforms requiring Ethereum ecosystem compatibility at lower transaction costs.

Choosing the right network

Payment infrastructure providers typically support multiple networks. High-value B2B payments might settle on Ethereum for maximum security. Consumer payouts might use Polygon or Base for negligible transaction costs. The choice depends on payment size, frequency, and recipient preferences.

Blockchain and compliance

Blockchain's transparency creates both advantages and challenges for regulated payment infrastructure:

Transaction monitoring

All transactions are publicly visible. This enables real-time anti-money laundering monitoring. Compliance teams can track payment flows across wallets and identify suspicious patterns without waiting for bank reports. Blockchain analytics companies like Chainalysis provide tools specifically for financial crime detection.

KYC/AML requirements

Payment platforms using blockchain infrastructure still must verify customer identities and screen transactions. The blockchain records payments, but the platform connecting users to blockchain rails handles KYC/AML compliance. This separates settlement infrastructure from compliance obligations.

Regulatory frameworks

Different jurisdictions regulate blockchain payments differently. The European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation (MiCA) provides a framework for stablecoin issuers. The US treats stablecoins under existing money transmission laws, requiring state-by-state licensing.

Stablecoin reserves

Regulators increasingly scrutinize stablecoin issuers' reserve management. Circle (USDC issuer) publishes monthly attestations of dollar reserves. This matters for payment platforms. Choosing stablecoins with transparent, audited reserves reduces regulatory risk.

Settlement finality

Traditional banking defines settlement finality through legal frameworks. Blockchain settlement achieves finality through cryptographic proof, but legal recognition varies by jurisdiction. Payment platforms must understand how each operating jurisdiction treats blockchain settlement.

‍

The key insight: blockchain handles settlement, but compliance happens at the application layer. A payment platform using blockchain infrastructure needs the same licenses and compliance processes as one using traditional rails.

Risks and limitations

Blockchain payment infrastructure faces specific challenges:

• Network congestion: High demand can increase transaction fees. During Ethereum congestion in 2021, fees exceeded $50 (USD) per transaction. Layer 2 networks largely solve this, but risk remains on base layer blockchains.
• Irreversibility: Once confirmed, blockchain transactions cannot be reversed. A payment sent to the wrong address is permanently lost. Traditional banking allows reversal of fraudulent or erroneous transfers. Payment platforms mitigate this through careful address validation.
• Private key management: Losing access to private keys means permanently losing access to funds. Unlike forgotten banking passwords, lost private keys have no recovery mechanism. Enterprise payment infrastructure typically uses multi-signature wallets and key management services.
• Bridge risks: Moving assets between different blockchains requires bridge protocols, which have been targets of major hacks. The Ronin bridge hack in 2022 resulted in $600 million (USD) in losses. Payment infrastructure minimizing cross-chain bridging reduces this risk.
• Regulatory uncertainty: Blockchain payment regulation continues evolving. A payment platform compliant today might face new requirements tomorrow. This uncertainty complicates long-term infrastructure planning.
• Smart contract bugs: Programmable payments depend on smart contract code. Bugs in smart contracts have resulted in millions in losses. Payment platforms using smart contracts need thorough security audits.

These risks are manageable but require careful infrastructure design. Payment platforms successful with blockchain rails typically combine blockchain's settlement advantages with additional security and compliance layers.

Blockchain's role in modern payment infrastructure

Blockchain functions as settlement infrastructure, not a complete payment solution. Think of it like faster, cheaper versions of ACH or SWIFT, not as a replacement for banking entirely.

A fintech company using blockchain infrastructure typically combines it with traditional banking. Users deposit local currency via bank transfer. The platform converts to stablecoins and settles payments on blockchain rails. Then the recipient converts back to local currency through traditional banking.

The blockchain handles the middle part, the actual cross-border settlement, where traditional rails are slowest and most expensive.

This hybrid approach captures blockchain's settlement advantages while addressing its limitations. Traditional banking handles fiat on/off ramps and regulatory compliance. Blockchain handles instant, low-cost settlement. Neither replaces the other.

For payment platforms evaluating blockchain integration, the key questions are:

• Does instant settlement create value for your use case?
• Can you handle irreversible payments?
• Do your operating volumes justify building blockchain infrastructure?

If settlement speed or cost materially impacts your business model, blockchain infrastructure is worth evaluating.

Due provides payment infrastructure that combines blockchain settlement with traditional banking rails, enabling instant cross-border payments through a single API.